In this article
A meal voucher is money a guest is already holding — and it's also the tax-free benefit your own kitchen and floor are least likely to be offered anywhere in the sector.
Somewhere between the €39-a-month POS add-on and the card terminal's interchange fee, this site has priced almost every way money moves through a restaurant. It has never priced this one: the meal voucher — titres-restaurant in France, maaltijdcheques in Belgium, stravenky in Czechia, buoni pasto in Italy, and a national equivalent in most of the 24 markets this site serves.
It is easy to wave past as a niche B2B benefit. It isn't. In France alone, 5.5 million people redeem one every working day, at 243,000 approved merchants. That is a payment method with more daily users than most card schemes this site has written about individually — and a restaurant that doesn't display the decal is invisible to every one of them the moment they open their wallet.
There is a second half most owners never look at, and it is the sharper number. In Belgium, 62% of employers now give their staff meal vouchers — a tax-free instrument that puts real spending power in an employee's pocket at a fraction of what the same net amount costs through a payroll rise. In hospitality, only 21% do. The industry that literally serves the meal is the worst-placed sector in the country at using the meal-voucher mechanism for its own team.
Both halves have a real cost and a real number behind them, and neither is obvious from the outside. This article unbundles both — what accepting vouchers from guests actually costs next to a card terminal, and what NOT offering them to staff is quietly costing you in hiring power.
Why this is two decisions, not one
The guest-facing decision and the staff-facing decision are handled by different people in most restaurants — often nobody at all — and they get resolved by inertia rather than by arithmetic. "We never signed up for a terminal" and "we've just always paid a wage" are both defaults, not conclusions.
They also aren't the same trade-off. Accepting vouchers from guests costs you a commission and a payment delay in exchange for reach: guests who would otherwise spend that balance at the place next door that already takes it. Offering vouchers to staff costs you a fixed monthly amount in exchange for retention: the same net pay, delivered through a channel your competitor down the street may already be using and you aren't.
Treating them as one "meal voucher question" is how both get ignored. Treating them as two separate, priced decisions — which is what the rest of this article does — is how you actually decide.
Free guide The complete restaurant finance guide Every money decision on this site, in one place Read the guideThe 7 numbers
Five are facts worth checking against your own country's scheme. Two are numbers only your own till and your own payroll can produce — which is what the calculator further down is for.
1. 5.5 million daily users, 243,000 approved merchants
That is France's own scheme alone (French Ministry of Economy figures) — one national scheme among several this site's 24 markets run. Belgium, Czechia, Slovakia, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Romania and Bulgaria all run comparable, widely-held schemes of their own, each with its own issuer network and its own approved-merchant list.
The number that matters for your own till isn't France's — it's whether the scheme is a normal part of a paycheck where you trade. If it is, every guest carrying a balance is a guest who can only spend it at a merchant that accepts it, which is a filter on where they eat that has nothing to do with your food.
2. 3–5%: the commission nobody has put next to your card fees
Voucher issuers charge a merchant commission on every voucher you redeem, typically in the 1.5–5% range depending on the issuer, your volume and your country — a real, unbundled cost in the same family as the card fees this site already unbundled, and one this site has never put next to them until now.
It is not automatically worse than a card. It is a different price for a different kind of reach, and the graphic below puts the two side by side for one euro of revenue, so the comparison is visible rather than assumed.
Cash, card and meal voucher, side by side — the same illustrative sale, three ways it can be paid.
The voucher bar folds the reimbursement delay in as a financing-equivalent cost (see number 3) — a card's own next-business-day settlement makes its own float cost negligible by comparison, which is what makes this a fair side-by-side.
3. 21 days: the reimbursement delay a card doesn't have
French law caps the maximum time a voucher issuer may take to reimburse a restaurant at 21 days from submission — against a card terminal's next-business-day settlement. That gap is a working-capital cost, not just an inconvenience: for three weeks, revenue you have already earned sits with the issuer instead of your bank account.
It's a real number, and it's small next to the commission for most restaurants — but it compounds with volume, and it's the reason "we take vouchers" is not the same statement as "we take cards," even before the fee percentage is compared.
4. €8 / €25: the caps that decide how much of a bill a voucher can cover
Two ceilings, not one. A face-value cap on the voucher itself — around €8 in Belgium's scheme, for example — decides how much a single voucher is worth. A daily spending cap per employee — €25 in France since October 2022 — decides how many vouchers a guest may legally use on one bill.
Both caps mean "we accept meal vouchers" almost never means the whole bill is covered. A guest paying with vouchers for a €38 lunch is still going to need a card or cash for the rest — which is worth knowing before you promise a guest more than the scheme actually allows.
5. The end-of-February cliff — and the demand pattern it creates
Paper vouchers in schemes like France's carry a hard expiry: unused vouchers from the previous calendar year stop being valid at the end of February. That use-it-or-lose-it deadline concentrates redemptions into the first weeks of the year in a way that has nothing to do with weather, tourism or any of the seasonal demand drivers this site's other articles already train you to look for.
It's a promotable fact, not just a warning: a Q1 lunch push aimed at guests sitting on an expiring balance is a demand lever most restaurants never pull, because most restaurants never learn the deadline exists.
A typical year, indexed to 100 — an expiry-driven scheme (like France's end-of-February cliff) concentrates demand into Q1.
August dips with the seasonal closures this site's other articles already cover; February peaks with the use-it-or-lose-it deadline — a lever worth a Q1 promotion aimed at guests sitting on an expiring balance.
6. 21% vs. 62% — hospitality's own blind spot
Belgian labour-market data (SD Worx, October 2025) puts meal-voucher uptake at 62% of employers economy-wide — nearly double where it stood in 2019. Break it down by sector and hospitality sits at just 21%, the lowest of any sector measured, behind agriculture (39%) and private education (47%).
That is a genuinely striking number for an industry built entirely around meals: the sector that serves them is the worst-placed sector in the country at using the country's own tax-free mechanism to feed its own team. If a competitor two doors down already offers it and you don't, you are losing a hiring conversation you didn't know you were having.
7. The only two numbers that are actually yours
Everything above is a fact about a scheme. Neither the real cost of accepting vouchers from your own guests nor the real cost of offering them to your own team exists until you put your own numbers in — your own monthly voucher volume, your own headcount, your own commission rate. That's what the calculator below is for.
What it actually costs you — both directions
One calculator, two modes. "Accepting vouchers" prices the guest-payment decision against a card terminal for your own monthly volume. "Offering vouchers to staff" prices the staff-benefit decision against an equivalent net-pay rise for your own headcount.
Both start from the illustrative numbers above so you can see the shape of the answer immediately — then replace them with your own.
The meal-voucher calculator
Two modes, one mechanism — the guest side and the staff side, priced against the alternative you'd actually take instead.
Your own monthly voucher revenue, commission rate and reimbursement delay — priced against the equivalent volume on a card.
The financing rate is your own rough cost of capital; 8% a year is a reasonable independent-restaurant default if you don't have your own figure.
—
Your own headcount, the scheme's face value and your employer contribution share — priced against matching the same net amount through a gross-salary rise.
The uplift factor is the illustrative multiplier it typically costs to hand an employee the same NET amount through taxed salary instead of a tax-free voucher; adjust it to your own country's payroll-tax wedge if you know it.
—
Illustrative model, not tax or payroll advice. Commission rates, reimbursement delays, face-value ceilings and the employer/employee contribution split all vary by issuer, scheme and country — check your own before committing to either decision.
Neither number is a verdict on its own. A restaurant with mostly card-paying regulars and a full floor may reasonably decide the commission isn't worth chasing a small extra crowd. A restaurant losing candidates to a competitor that already offers vouchers is looking at a hiring cost the benefit-mode tile makes concrete rather than abstract.
What both modes share is the same discipline: don't guess the number, compute it — and compute it against the alternative you'd actually take instead, not against doing nothing.
How to actually decide
Four steps, in order — checking your own scheme before pricing anything is what keeps the rest honest.
1. Check what your own country actually runs
- Confirm whether a meal-voucher scheme is a normal part of a paycheck where you trade, and how widely it's held — a scheme almost nobody near you carries isn't worth chasing.
- Get the real commission rate and reimbursement delay from an issuer directly; the ranges above are typical, not universal, and negotiate on volume where the issuer allows it.
2. Price the guest side against your card terminal, not in isolation
- Run the acceptance mode above with your own numbers, not the defaults.
- Weigh the extra cost against the guests you'd only reach because you display the decal — not against an assumption that every voucher-holder would have paid another way anyway.
3. Price the staff side against a raise, not against nothing
- Run the benefit mode above with your own headcount and your country's own tax-free ceiling.
- Compare the result to what a competitor down the street is already offering, if you know it — the number that changes a hiring decision is relative, not absolute.
4. Decide the two questions separately
- A yes on one side doesn't obligate a yes on the other — they solve different problems for different people.
- Revisit both once a year: commission rates, caps and uptake all move, and a decision made two years ago on old numbers is a decision made on the wrong numbers.
The number that was hiding in plain sight
Meal vouchers were never a hidden cost or a hidden benefit — they were an unpriced one. Nobody on either side of the till sat down and worked out what the commission plus the delay actually comes to, or what offering the same tax-free benefit your competitor already offers would actually cost you.
Now both numbers exist. Whichever way they come out for your own restaurant, that's a genuine decision — not the default you were making by not looking.
If the honest answer on the staff side is that you can't yet afford it, that's still worth knowing before a candidate asks and you find out you didn't have an answer.